The Bible class led by Cole Tuck on Sunday, February 1, 2026, focused on Romans chapter 9, a dense and theologically weighty passage often cited in discussions of Calvinism. The lesson emphasized a non-Calvinist interpretation, arguing that the chapter addresses God’s sovereign choices regarding nations (particularly Israel vs. other nations/Gentiles) and the inclusion of Gentiles in God’s promises through faith, rather than individual predestination to salvation or damnation.
In Romans 9, Paul expresses deep sorrow over many fellow Israelites rejecting Jesus as Messiah, despite their privileged heritage (vv. 1–5). He defends God’s faithfulness: His word has not failed, because true “Israel” is not defined by physical descent but by God’s promise and faith (vv. 6–9). Using examples like Isaac over Ishmael and Jacob over Esau, Paul shows God’s choices are sovereign and not based on human works, merit, or ethnicity—but these examples refer to national roles in God’s plan (e.g., through which line the Messiah would come), not individual eternal destinies.
Paul quotes Malachi 1 (“Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated”) to illustrate God’s preference for Israel (Jacob’s nation) over Edom (Esau’s nation), not personal hatred or damnation of individuals. The chapter counters Jewish objections to Gentiles’ inclusion in God’s people: God’s mercy and hardening (e.g., Pharaoh) serve His purposes, and no one can question the Creator’s rights (potter and clay analogy, vv. 19–24). Ultimately, salvation comes through faith in Christ, not lineage or works. Gentiles attained righteousness by faith, while many Israelites stumbled by pursuing it through law/works (vv. 30–33). Paul highlights a remnant saved by faith, affirming that God’s plan includes all who believe, Jew or Gentile.
The lesson challenged Calvinist readings (TULIP: Total depravity, Unconditional election, Limited atonement, Irresistible grace, Perseverance of the saints) by showing the chapter’s context is national election and covenant promises, not arbitrary individual salvation/damnation. It underscores God’s love for all (seen in Paul’s grief and desire for Israel’s salvation) and the universal offer of salvation through faith.
Talking Points
- Paul’s anguish for unsaved Israelites shows God’s deep love for the lost, contrasting with Calvinist views that God doesn’t truly desire all to be saved.
- Not all Israel is Israel — Salvation isn’t automatic by descent (e.g., Abraham’s line through Isaac, not Ishmael; Jacob over Esau represents national election, not individual souls).
- Jacob and Esau — “Loved” and “hated” to refer to God’s choice of nations (Israel over Edom), as clarified in Malachi 1; “hate” means relative preference/non-election for covenant role, not personal damnation (cf. Jesus’ “hate” your family in comparison to loving God).
- God’s sovereignty is upheld without making Him unloving or unjust; He chooses freely (no works/merit), but offers mercy to all who believe.
- Potter and clay — Addresses complaints about fairness in national blessings (e.g., why Israel over others?), not why some are created for hell; no one is owed earthly privilege or salvation.
- Faith vs. works — Israel stumbled by relying on law/descent; Gentiles attained righteousness by faith—salvation is open to all.
- God’s love and fairness — If Paul loves the lost more than God does (per Calvinism), that’s impossible; God commands love for enemies because He loves them first.
- Application — Avoid pride in heritage/status; salvation is by faith in Christ, not birthright or effort, and embrace humility and evangelism.